Terence Crosbie, a 38yearold firefighter from Dublin, has been found guilty of rape in Boston. The incident occurred on March 15, 2024, while Crosbie was in town for the St. Patrick’s Day parade with his colleagues.

Trial Overview

This trial marked Crosbie’s second attempt to contest the charges. The first trial ended in a mistrial in June 2025 after jurors were unable to reach a unanimous decision. The jury began deliberations for the second trial on October 21, 2025.

Details of the Incident

  • Victim claimed she fell asleep after having consensual sex with Liam O’Brien, another firefighter.
  • She testified that she awoke to find Crosbie assaulting her.
  • Surveillance footage showed Crosbie entering the hotel room around the time of the alleged assault.

Evidential Findings

During the trial, prosecutors presented several pieces of evidence:

  • A rape kit was administered at Massachusetts General Hospital, which revealed DNA from two males but could not conclusively identify either.
  • Crosbie admitted to being in the hotel room but denied any interaction with the woman.

Defense Arguments

Crosbie’s defense team emphasized the lack of conclusive evidence:

  • The absence of video or audio recording of the alleged assault.
  • The victim’s blood alcohol level was estimated to be between 0.155% and 0.235%. The defense argued this impaired her perceptions.
  • Crosbie’s attorney suggested there was reasonable doubt regarding the victim’s claims.

Verdict and Sentencing

The jury ultimately found Terence Crosbie guilty on a single count of rape. Upon the reading of the verdict, his $100,000 bail was revoked. Sentencing is scheduled for October 30, 2025.

Key Points from the Trial

Throughout the trial proceedings, the following events were noteworthy:

  • Day 1: The prosecution opened with a discussion of the alleged incident.
  • Day 5: Closing arguments highlighted key points of contention.
  • Day 7: The verdict was delivered after three days of jury deliberations.

The case has drawn significant attention due to the severity of the allegations and the profession of the accused. The trial’s outcome plays a crucial role in discussions about accountability among public service representatives.

شاركها.